12 hrs/week

saved per recruiter, measured against the manual process

Where it fits
Staffing and recruiting firms, and any high-volume intake operation
Stack
Form capture, resume parsing, an LLM screening step, CRM write-back, and scheduled follow-ups
Build time
Built and handed off inside one engagement cycle

The starting point

A recruiting team was running candidate intake by hand. Every new applicant meant the same sequence: pull the resume out of email, retype the key details into the CRM, check it against the role requirements, write a first-contact message, book a screen, and set a reminder to follow up if the candidate went quiet.

Each pass took a recruiter roughly 20 to 30 minutes. At the team's volume, that was most of a day every week, per person, spent on data movement rather than talking to candidates.

What was built

The workflow runs in six steps and starts the moment an application lands:

  1. Capture. The application form writes straight into a single intake record. No copy and paste.
  2. Parse. The resume is read automatically. Name, contact details, current title, years of experience, and location are pulled into structured fields.
  3. Screen. An AI step compares the parsed profile against the role's must-haves and flags the record as a strong, possible, or weak match, with a one-line reason a recruiter can read in seconds.
  4. Draft. A first-contact message is written using the candidate's details and the role, ready for the recruiter to edit and send.
  5. Write back. Everything lands in the CRM in the right fields, linked to the right role.
  6. Follow up. If the candidate does not reply within a set window, a reminder and a follow-up draft appear automatically.

A recruiter still makes every real decision. They read the match reason, adjust the message, and choose who moves forward. The workflow removes the retyping, the checking, and the remembering.

The result

Measured against the manual process, the workflow gave back 12 hours per week per recruiter. That time moved to candidate conversations and client work, which is where a recruiter's judgment actually matters.

The build also made the pipeline legible. Because every candidate now enters through the same six steps, a manager can see where things stand without asking anyone.

Where this applies

Any operation with high-volume, structured intake has this shape. Client onboarding at an accounting or law firm, lead intake at an agency, and support ticket triage all follow the same pattern: a form or an inbox, a set of checks, a first response, and a follow-up.

If your team is retyping the same information into the same systems every day, that is the tell. Get a breakdown of what the automated version looks like for your process.

See where your team stands

The GTM AI Readiness Assessment scores you across data, automation, AI depth, ownership, process, and GTM alignment, then names the one workflow to build first. About three minutes, no call needed.

Take the Assessment

Prefer to talk it through? Tell us what you're working on →